This site uses cookies.
Some of these cookies are essential to the operation of the site,
while others help to improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.
For more information, please see the ProZ.com privacy policy.
Michael Wetzel Germany Local time: 18:43 German to English
dictionary vs. encyclopedia
May 11, 2010
From the comments at The Guardian, it's not clear if the complaint is factually correct. At any rate, the current Webster's New World College Dictionary (US) doesn't have it wrong (they don't say anything about pressure or gravity). Which brings me to my point: a comparison of the almost interchangeable definitions of "dictionary" and "encyclopedia" in the current ODE (I don't have the OED) seems much more irritating. The real problem is that someone was trying to find and that someone... See more
From the comments at The Guardian, it's not clear if the complaint is factually correct. At any rate, the current Webster's New World College Dictionary (US) doesn't have it wrong (they don't say anything about pressure or gravity). Which brings me to my point: a comparison of the almost interchangeable definitions of "dictionary" and "encyclopedia" in the current ODE (I don't have the OED) seems much more irritating. The real problem is that someone was trying to find and that someone else was trying to offer this kind of information in a dictionary. ▲ Collapse
Subject:
Comment:
The contents of this post will automatically be included in the ticket generated. Please add any additional comments or explanation (optional)
Kaspars Melkis United Kingdom Local time: 17:43 English to Latvian + ...
siphon of hot air
May 11, 2010
Complaining about the OED definition looks like a crave for attention.
In his paper Dr. Hughes criticizes the dictionary definition but agrees with Wikipedia which basically confirms the dictionary that the atmospheric pressure is the main factor why it works. I am not sure if it was a genuine misinterpretation of the dictionary entry or dislike that it is too concise unlike encyclopedia, but I wouldn't call it wrong. I don't expect to be able to get a complete understanding how the u... See more
Complaining about the OED definition looks like a crave for attention.
In his paper Dr. Hughes criticizes the dictionary definition but agrees with Wikipedia which basically confirms the dictionary that the atmospheric pressure is the main factor why it works. I am not sure if it was a genuine misinterpretation of the dictionary entry or dislike that it is too concise unlike encyclopedia, but I wouldn't call it wrong. I don't expect to be able to get a complete understanding how the universe works from the dictionary ▲ Collapse
Subject:
Comment:
The contents of this post will automatically be included in the ticket generated. Please add any additional comments or explanation (optional)
amanda solymosi Hungary Local time: 18:43 Hungarian to English + ...
I love that........
May 11, 2010
"I don't expect to get a complete explanation of how the universe works from a dictionary". Well quite!
Subject:
Comment:
The contents of this post will automatically be included in the ticket generated. Please add any additional comments or explanation (optional)
Brian Young United States Local time: 09:43 Danish to English
How a siphon works
May 13, 2010
This is a troubling report, and can lead to a lot of confusion about siphons.
Siphons do in fact use gravity, and air pressure. Air pressure is itself due to gravity. Gravity is what causes a normal column of air to attain a weight of about 14 pounds per square inch.
Everyone who has had basic physics knows that the maximum height that water can be "sucked" up is about 33 feet. That is with a perfect vacuum applied to one end of a pipe. Atmospheric pressure actually pushes water up ... See more
This is a troubling report, and can lead to a lot of confusion about siphons.
Siphons do in fact use gravity, and air pressure. Air pressure is itself due to gravity. Gravity is what causes a normal column of air to attain a weight of about 14 pounds per square inch.
Everyone who has had basic physics knows that the maximum height that water can be "sucked" up is about 33 feet. That is with a perfect vacuum applied to one end of a pipe. Atmospheric pressure actually pushes water up the pipe. A one square inch water column 33' feet tall weighs 14 pounds.
In the case of a siphon, water falling back down one side of an inverted U pipe causes a partial vacuum, and it is that vacuum that "sucks" the water up the siphon. The important thing to understand is that it is not the "sucking", but the atmospheric pressure on the body of water that pushes the water up the siphon, and if the siphon is less than 33' high, and the outlet is lower than the water level, which is a requirement, so that the weight of the falling water is greater that the weight of the water being "sucked up", the the siphon will work as long as those conditions remain.
I think this has been blown way out of proportion. ▲ Collapse
Subject:
Comment:
The contents of this post will automatically be included in the ticket generated. Please add any additional comments or explanation (optional)
Translate faster & easier, using a sophisticated CAT tool built by a translator / developer.
Accept jobs from clients who use Trados, MemoQ, Wordfast & major CAT tools.
Download and start using CafeTran Espresso -- for free
The leading translation software used by over 270,000 translators.
Designed with your feedback in mind, Trados Studio 2022 delivers an unrivalled, powerful desktop
and cloud solution, empowering you to work in the most efficient and cost-effective way.