Aug 4, 2009 19:10
14 yrs ago
Russian term

выигрыш в три раза

Russian to English Science Science (general) scientific writing
Данный подход позволяет получить выигрыш в количестве численных операций в три раза.

Proposed translations

+3
23 mins
Selected

a three-fold improvement

Ordinarily, "выигрыш" gets translated as "increase" or "gain." However, if it's clear that the approach used decreases the number of numerical operations and "выигрыш" is the word used to characterize it, then it must be a good thing . . .

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 hrs (2009-08-04 21:17:11 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Ellen, I would just go with the Russian grammar and say "a three-fold improvement in the number of numerical operations." The wider context might lead you to a different wording, of course.

My first thought was that it indicated an increase in a computer's number-crunching capability, but your clarification suggests that the improvement is algorithmic -- an area where the Russians have excelled.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 hrs (2009-08-04 21:28:30 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Sorry, I should have address that comment to Nik -- I didn't scroll up far enough.
Note from asker:
Where would you insert "the number of numerical operations"?
Call me Dmitry, not Ellen :))
Peer comment(s):

agree Alexander Onishko
6 mins
Thanks, Alexander.
agree Victor Zagria : bingo!
9 mins
Thanks, Victor.
agree Jack Doughty
13 mins
Thanks, Jack.
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "Selected automatically based on peer agreement."
3 mins

a three-fold profit (rise)

I´d say
Note from asker:
the number of operations was decreased rather than increased
Something went wrong...
11 mins

three-fold increase in the number of numerical operations

-
Peer comment(s):

neutral SirReaL : почти наверняка речь о сокращении количества операций
1 min
neutral Vitaly Kisin : with Misha
22 hrs
Something went wrong...
9 mins

a three-fold gain

yields a three-fold gain in ...

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 11 mins (2009-08-04 19:22:00 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

in reducing ...
Something went wrong...
24 mins

allows for a three-fold increase from the number of numerical operations

It seems that the three-fold increase is in the efficiency, not in the number of operations, hence - new answer.
Something went wrong...
+1
1 hr

triples

This approach triples the number of numerical operations...

With this approach, it is possible to triple...

This approach makes it possible to triple...

(Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't understand the advantage of expressions with "three-fold", when we're going in the positive direction and we're not talking about % increases. But all the "three-fold" suggestions make me nervous, so I'm only putting confidence level of 3.)

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 3 hrs (2009-08-04 22:18:14 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Note after Nik-On/Off's explanation that the improvement is a decrease (which should have been obvious, I guess): I think that's all the more reason to avoid "three-fold." Probably there are a few ways:

This approach improves the number of numerical operations by a factor of three.

This approach makes it possible to reduce the number of numerical operations by two-thirds.

This approach makes it possible to economize on the number of numerical operations by a factor of three [by two-thirds].
Note from asker:
Rachel, the number of operations was descreased, not increased. That's the problem
Peer comment(s):

agree SirReaL : with "two-thirds"
20 hrs
Thanks, Mikhail.
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search