Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Spanish term or phrase:
pareja de hecho
English translation:
are living together
Spanish term
pareja de hecho
5 +1 | are living together |
Henry Hinds
![]() |
4 +1 | unmarried couple |
MarinaM
![]() |
5 | common-law marriage (U.S.A.) |
teresa quimper
![]() |
4 | Non-marital partnership/relationship |
John Cutler
![]() |
2 | Significant Other |
Rosa Garcia
![]() |
Nov 7, 2007 20:16: Henry Hinds Created KOG entry
Non-PRO (1): AllegroTrans
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
are living together
Non-marital partnership/relationship
European civil service, Social affairs, LAW, Rights and freedoms [Council] Full entry
ES
pareja de hecho
pareja estable no matrimonial
unión civil
EN
non-marital relationship
non-marital partnership
common-law marriage (U.S.A.)
Significant Other
Therapy Sessions for Patient and Significant Other
Something went wrong...